Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute; Ministery Of Infrastructure And The Environment

Publications, presentations and other activities
Regime transitions in near-surface temperature inversions: a conceptual model.
by B.J.H. van de Wiel (TU-Delft, NL), E. Vignon (CNRS / Université Grenoble Alpes, France), P. Baas (TU-Delft, NL), I.G.S. van Hooijdonk (TU-Eindhoven, NL), S.J.A. van der Linden (TU-Delft, NL)J.A. van Hooft (TU-Delft)F.C. Bosveld (KNMI)S.R. de Roode (TU-Delft, NL)A.F. Moene (Wageningen Universiteit, NL)C.G. Genthon (CNRS / Université Grenoble Alpes, France)

A conceptual model is used in combination with observational analysis to understand regime
transitions of near surface temperature inversions at night as well as in Arctic conditions. The
model combines a surface energy budget with a bulk parameterization for turbulent heat transport. Feedbacks due to soil and radiative heat transfer are accounted for by a ‘lumped parameter closure’, which represents the ‘coupling strength’ of the system.

Observations from Cabauw, Netherlands as well as from Dome C, Antarctica, are analyzed. As expected, inversions are weak for strong winds, whereas large inversions are found under weak wind conditions. However, a sharp transition is found between those
regimes, as it occurs within a narrow wind range. This results in a typical, S-shaped dependency. The conceptual model explains why this characteristic must be a robust feature. Typical differences between the Cabauw and Dome C cases are explained from differences in coupling strength (being weaker in the Antarctic). For comparison, a realistic column model is run. As findings are similar to the simple model and the observational analysis, it suggests generality of the results.

Theoretical analysis reveals that, in the transition zone, the response time of the system to perturbations becomes very weak. As resilience to perturbations becomes weaker, it may explain why, within this wind regime, an increase of scatter is found. Finally, the socalled ‘heat flux duality’ paradox is analyzed. It is explained why numerical simulations with prescribed surface fluxes show a dynamical response different from more realistic, surface coupled systems.

Bibliographic data
Wiel, B.J.H. van de, E. Vignon, P. Baas, I.G.S. van Hooijdonk, S.J.A. van der Linden, J.A. van Hooft, F.C. Bosveld, S.R. de Roode, A.F. Moene and C.G. Genthon, Regime transitions in near-surface temperature inversions: a conceptual model.
accepted, J. Atmos. Sci., 2017, 74, 4, 1057-1073, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-16-0180.1.
Abstract (html)